A Comparative Study to Assess the Quality of Life and Stress among Orphan and Non-orphan Children in Selected Areas of Bagalkot

Authors

  • Shivashankar H Kalagi MSc Nursing, BVVS Sajjalashree Institute of Nursing Sciences, Navanagar, Bagalkot, Karnataka, India.
  • Santosh Sajjan Associate Professor, BVVS Sajjalashree Institute of Nursing Sciences, Navanagar, Bagalkot, Karnataka, India.
  • Deelip S Natekar Principal, BVVS Sajjalashree Institute of Nursing Sciences, Navanagar, Bagalkot, Karnataka, India.

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.24321/2348.2133.202007

Abstract

Introduction: The word orphan comes from the Greek word ‘Orfanos’ and refers to a child permanently bereaved of or abandoned by his or her parents.
Methods: A non-experimental descriptive comparative design has been adopted for the present study. The sample of the present study comprises orphan children residing in an orphanage and non-orphan children residing in selected areas of Bagalkot. The sample comprised 30 orphans and 30 non-orphans aged between 10 and 16 years. The data were collected by using self-report, structured closed-ended questionnaires for socio-demographic variables of children, self-administered WHO Quality of life BREF scale, and PSS stress scale. The data obtained were analysed with the help of descriptive and inferential statistics.
Result: Findings related to the comparison between the level of stress among the orphan and non-orphan children revealed that majority of orphan children (76.66%) had about moderate stress, 23.33% of the orphan children had high stress, and none of the children had a low level of stress, whereas among non-orphan children, majority (90%) had moderate stress, 10% had low level stress, and none of them had high level stress.
The findings related to the comparison of levels of quality of life among the orphan and non-orphan children reveal that a high percentage of orphan children (66.66%) had a moderate quality of life and some of them (33.33%) had a poor quality of life, whereas a high number of non-orphan children (66.66%) had a very good quality of life and some (33.33%) had a good quality of life. No significant association was found between the quality of life and stress scores with the socio-demographic variables of orphan and non-orphan children.
Conclusion: The study concluded that orphan children need to improve their quality of life and decrease their level of stress.

How to cite this article:
Kalagi SH, Sajjan SB, Natekar DS. A Comparative Study to Assess the Quality of Life and Stress among Orphan and Non-orphan Children in Selected Areas of Bagalkot. Ind J Holist Nurs 2020; 11(4): 19-25.

References

Bhat AA, Rahman S, Bhat NM. Mental Health Issues in Institutionalized Adolescent Orphans. Int J Ind Psych 2015; 3(1): 57-77.

Singh A, Suvidha. Well Being of Orphan: A Review on Their Mental Health Status. Int J Sci Res Sci Tech 2016; 2(5): 2395-6011.

Orphan Statistics, Facts and Figures. (2012). Retrieved November 4, 2017, Devi B, Reddy VS. Stress and Coping Strategies Among Orphan Children. Paripex-Ind J Res 2017; 6(8).

Datta P, Ganguly S, Roy BN. The prevalence of behavioural disorders among the children under parental care and out of parental care: A Comparative Study in India. Int J Pediatr Adolesc Med 2018; 5(4): 145-151.

Kaur R, Vinnakota A, Panigrahi S, Manasa RV. A Descriptive Study on Behavioral and Emotional Problems in Orphans and Other Vulnerable Children Staying in Institutional Homes. Indian J Psychol Med 2018; 40(2): 161-168.

Birhanu F. A comparative cross sectional study on psychological well being of orphan and non orphan children. Current Psych 2010; 17(2): 342-344.

Nyamukapa CA, Gregson S, Lopman B et al. Orphan psycho social distress; theoretical frame work tested with data. Am J Public Health 2008; 98(1): 133-141.

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). Measuring Healthy Days: Population Assessment of Health Related Quality of Life. Atlanta, GA; CDC; 2000.

Abdussalam M. Social Competence and Quality of Life: A Comparative Study among Orphans and Non-Orphans. Phonix - Int J Psychol Soc Sc 2017; 1(3).

Downloads

Published

2020-12-31